Not to be confused with Fritz Lang's "While the City Sleeps", "City that Never Sleeps" is a first-rate little programmer about a disillusioned cop's plans to ditch his wife and run off with showgirl Mala Powers. The cop is Gig Young, (miscast and not at his best), and the city in question is Chicago and the action takes place over the course of one night. The good supporting cast includes William Talman as a killer, Edward Arnold as a crooked lawyer, Marie Windsor as Arnold's two-timing wife and Chill Wills as Young's slightly out-of-this-world partner. Imaginatively directed by John H. Auer, (whoever he was), and with a good and somewhat unusual plot with fine, atmospheric cinematography from John L. Russell this is certainly a cut above your average B-Movie and is worth seeking out.
I have been reviewing films all my life, semi-professionally in the past and for the past 10 or 12 years on imdb and more recently in letterboxd and facebook. The idea of this blog is to get as many of those reviews gathered together in one place. I have had a great deal of support and encouragement from a lot of people throughout the world and I hope that continues. Now for the ratings. **** = not to be missed. *** = highly recommended. ** = recommended. * = of interest and no stars = avoid..
Sunday, 28 June 2020
Friday, 26 June 2020
THE BIG BUS **

Wednesday, 24 June 2020
LOVE no stars

With a title like "Love", of course, you might think the violence level will be minimal and you'd be right but "Love" isn't so much concerned with love, (the word is used a tad too often for my liking), but sex and lots of it and in 3D, too. This is a two-and-a-quarter hour porn movie but if it's porn you're after, just ditch this rubbish and stick with the real McCoy. Not that I needed proof, but this sure proves Noe is probably the most overrated director alive.
Sunday, 21 June 2020
THEY DIED WITH THEIR BOOTS ON *


Directed by Raoul Walsh, for the most part this is rousing entertainment with a great supporting cast but unfortunately it also comes across as deeply, if perhaps unintentionally, racist though I suppose you have to look at it from an historical perspective, (it still leaves a bad taste). Two years after winning an Oscar for "Gone With the Wind" Hattie McDaniel is playing another appalling variation of her 'Mammy' character. McDaniel was a superb actress dished by Hollywood; here she's not only a 'Mammy' character but a Mammy who can tell fortunes. And don't even get me started on the treatment of Native Americans, (here just pesky Red Skins), with that famous 'Indian' Anthony Quinn as Crazy Horse.. However, if you can overlook these faults this remains as stirring an epic on the infamous Custer as we've seen; just don't believe it.
Tuesday, 16 June 2020
VITALINA VARELA no stars

The title character, Vitalina Varela, is a Cape Verdean woman who travels to Lisbon after the death of her husband, perhaps to set his affairs in order, perhaps just to find out more about the man who abandoned her. Vitalina Varela also happens to be the name of the actress playing her and, although she has only appeared in this and one other Costa picture, must surely be considered an actress, (she did win Best Actress at Locarno), and not just the character she is 'playing'. But then Costa likes to cast people in his films playing people who may or may not be variations of themselves. He likes to blur the lines between fact and fiction and he does so very, very slowly though certainly with a degree of skill.
There are people who swear by his films, (others may swear at them); people who see in Costa a new kind of film-maker, a saviour of the cinema in an age of paltry, mindless 'entertainments' where even the new 'art-house' directors like Claire Denis and Bruno Dumont are selling out but to quote a certain Miss Jean Brodie, 'for those who like this sort of thing, this is the sort of thing they like'. I have no doubt cineastes amongst my readers will already be picking up their brickbats to hurl at me for not loving this but hopefully not too many will have seen it and I will live to review another day.
Monday, 15 June 2020
THE 12TH MAN **

Sunday, 14 June 2020
WADJDA ****

Haifaa Al-Monsour's film is certainly radical coming, as it does, from a culture where women and girls are treated very differently from other parts of the world but it is so open and funny and with such a wonderful performance from Waad Mohammad as Wadjda, (it's one of the great child performances), that you never think of it being radical. Indeed, if it tells us anything it's that people are the same the world over, especially children. Yes, in the overall scheme of things "Wadjda" is important but it is, above all, hugely enjoyable.
Friday, 12 June 2020
JURASSIC WORLD; FALLEN KINGDOM ***

Thursday, 11 June 2020
THE ORPHANAGE ***

Shahrbanoo Sadat's second feature could easily have been full of neo-realist angst but Sadat imbues it with so much affection that the angst completely disappears even if the Bollywood tendency to kitsch is never far away while it's young cast, (non-professionals all), are excellent. This is a political film where the politics take a back seat and a coming-of-age movie devoid of sentimentality. Its sweetness is intoxicating and even when tragedy strikes Sadat never over-emphasizes but simply accepts that this is the way things are. A really lovely film.
CLOSED CIRCUIT **

There's certainly the material here for a very good thriller and it is quite exciting but it's also highly improbable. I just couldn't take it's plot seriously and as conspiracy theory thrillers go it's all been done before. Remember, this was a post 9/11 movie and we ought to have expected something a little closer to reality; we were in the middle of 'the war on terror' afte all. Certainly not a bad movie, then just a very familiar one.
Wednesday, 10 June 2020
GEORDIE **

THE WITCHES OF EASTWICK **

Tuesday, 9 June 2020
USKI ROTI ***
Mani Kaul's"Uski Roti" ('Our Daily Bread'), which came out in 1970, is now considered a classic of Indian New W
ave cinema and was, like the films of Satyajit Ray, heavily influenced by the Italian Neo-Realist Movement. In terms of its raw, unadorned style it could have been made twenty or thirty years earlier at least. Kaul uses black and white images rather than excessive dialogue to tell his story which is unusual in that it deals with the role of women in Indian society.
A young wife waits by the roadside for her husband, a bus driver, to drive past so she can give him 'roti' but he pays her little attention and has a mistress. I have no doubt a similarily themed movie made in the West would have been excessively melodramatic but Kaul opts for a documentary-like realism with heightened sound recording and a highly stylized form of acting. This is an Indian art-movie, quite clearly not designed for mass consumption and so simply constructed it feels positively primitive like the ethnographic studies of Murnau or Flaherty. It's virtually impossible to see it here now but if you get the chance I can warmly recommend it.

A young wife waits by the roadside for her husband, a bus driver, to drive past so she can give him 'roti' but he pays her little attention and has a mistress. I have no doubt a similarily themed movie made in the West would have been excessively melodramatic but Kaul opts for a documentary-like realism with heightened sound recording and a highly stylized form of acting. This is an Indian art-movie, quite clearly not designed for mass consumption and so simply constructed it feels positively primitive like the ethnographic studies of Murnau or Flaherty. It's virtually impossible to see it here now but if you get the chance I can warmly recommend it.
Thursday, 4 June 2020
THE SOUND OF FURY ***
Not quite a film-noir, not quite a B-Movie but this Cy Endfield directed crime flic could fit quite easily into either of those categories and was well enough thought of to earn a BAFTA nomination for Best Film From Any Source. Indeed, if anything it's a social conscience movie reminiscent of Lang's "Fury" and what's surprising is that it was made at all in the America of 1950. Frank Lovejoy is the down-on-his-luck veteran who falls in with hoodlum Lloyd Bridges, (terrific). When one of Bridges' schemes goes wrong Lovejoy finds himself in deeper than he could ever have imagined.
This is a violent and deeply disturbing picture that deals with a much uglier aspect of the American character than most movies of its kind. Likeable, sympathetic characters are thin on the ground and the eruption of violence that closes the picture is still shocking. Endfield, an American who worked most of his life in Britain, never really had the career he deserved, (he was a victim of McCarthyism) but he, like this terrific little picture is now ripe for rediscovery. This has cult movie written all over it
This is a violent and deeply disturbing picture that deals with a much uglier aspect of the American character than most movies of its kind. Likeable, sympathetic characters are thin on the ground and the eruption of violence that closes the picture is still shocking. Endfield, an American who worked most of his life in Britain, never really had the career he deserved, (he was a victim of McCarthyism) but he, like this terrific little picture is now ripe for rediscovery. This has cult movie written all over it
Tuesday, 2 June 2020
LET THE SUNSHINE IN ***

If the movie is less than hilarious it shows that Denis can still tackle comedy and that she has a much lighter side to her than we might have imagined. It's mostly a series of conversations, all of them smart with Binoche clearly relishing a terrific part, a potentially tragic character that she has great fun subverting. In fact, the only thing wrong with the picture is Binoche; she's such an extraordinarily beautiful woman and so obviously more intelligent than anyone else on screen, it's hard to believe her life can be such a mess. But if you accept that it is, then Denis' movie is a real treat and with a lovely end-of-movie cameo from Gerard Depardieu, what's not to love?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)